In the United States, statistics reveal a significant resistance among federal judges to presidential actions that challenge legal and constitutional norms. Data indicates that 50% of federal courts are standing firm against what is perceived as overreach by the president. This resistance comes just two months into the president’s term, highlighting a critical juncture in the balance of power among government branches. While one branch, Congress, shows a lower resistance rate, the judiciary’s stance underscores a pivotal moment in upholding the rule of law. These statistics not only reflect current governmental dynamics but also emphasize the judiciary’s role in maintaining constitutional integrity.
Sarah Isgur
@whignewtons
·
12h New data shows that judges across the ideological spectrum are ruling against the Trump admin. And no way you’re getting 67 senators to impeach a single one of these guys—let alone the majority of the federal judiciary! https://data4democracy.substack.com/p/measured-resistance-data-reveals?r=10322&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true…
Birmingham Born
@MDJD2
·
14h Shallow thinking Clay Travis. The Federal Courts are reacting to an unprecedented number of attempts at Executive overreach. The table below speaks for itself.
SeekingTruth
@envisionalt7
·
Mar 14 Excellent! Even a judge in the appeals court agrees the initial ruling is overreach.
“A judge warned””the lower court’s block went too far.”
America is winning with President Trump and team in charge.
@realDonaldTrump
George Washington
@FoundingPOTUS
·
Mar 20 Alarming statistics—67% of nationwide injunctions targeting Trump’s policies, mostly by Democrat-appointed judges, is outrageous! This has to stop!
Whatever happened to the will of the people? The judiciary shouldn’t override democratic choices like this.
Monte VanNortwick (vannortwick.org)
@montevan
·
Mar 19 Almost 70% of all injunctions against a president thus far this century have been issued by 92% Democrat-appointed federal judges against President Trump.
This is absolutely inexcusable and codifies what it looks like when an institution openly discredits itself in full view of
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
