Recent statistics show that 50% of Americans disapprove of presidential attacks on the judiciary. Chief Justice John Roberts publicly rebuked President Donald Trump after Trump called for the impeachment of a judge. This incident underscores a significant tension between the executive branch and the judiciary. According to polls, this disapproval rate reflects a broad public sentiment against such confrontations. The clash highlights the ongoing challenges within the separation of powers in the U.S. government. These statistics are crucial as they indicate public opinion on the matter, which can influence political and judicial dynamics.
Alex Schmidt
@ZAlexSc
·
Mar 15 A further sign that Trump is going way too far, that Americans must stand up to this before too late.“American Bar Association president speaks out against attacks on judges and lawyers”https://npr.org/2025/03/11/nx-s1-5317656/american-bar-association-trump-administration-attacks-judges-lawyers…
Republicans against Trump
@RpsAgainstTrump
·
23h The conservative editorial board of the National Review denounces Trump’s attacks on the judiciary:“It sometimes seems that Donald Trump and his most bitter antagonists live in a parallel universe of Trumplaw. In that mode, judges and lawyers abandon legal sobriety and bend
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
·
Feb 8 THE TYRANNY OF THE JUDICARYA handful of federal district judges in the most leftwing of our cities have essentially launched the most dangerous attack on separation of powers by issuing absurd rulings intended to slowdown or stop altogether decisions by newly re-elected
Bob MacDonald
@Bob_MacDonald
·
Mar 18 If you watched or read any news yesterday, you observed Trump, and his lawyers continued blatant and brazen attack on the place and power of the American judicial system. This continuing attack is a general rejection of democracy and a direct repudiation of our American form of
John 653
@JN_653
·
Mar 18 Don’t know if Trump knew of the disdain both Roberts and Barrett have towards him. The US Rule of Law has been under attack for decades and when it comes to the judiciary branch, it is only effective if it is perceived as impartial. That is no longer the case.
Justin
@inferno60x
·
Mar 18 As a licensed attorney, I’ve studied our Constitution & the power of our Judiciary to review Congressional laws & Presidential actions. This attack on the Judiciary is an attempt to destroy the checks & balances put in place over two centuries ago. We are not beholden to a king.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
