A junior data scientist has identified a potential 50% increase in accuracy for their team’s demand forecasting model through the application of causal inference. The current model, while functional, falls short in performance. After dedicating a day to researching causal inference, the junior data scientist believes this approach could significantly enhance their model’s effectiveness. Now, the challenge lies in presenting this idea to the principal data scientist for approval. The junior data scientist is considering whether to develop a proof of concept independently or to seek guidance on the best approach to move forward. This situation highlights the critical role that statistical methods like causal inference can play in improving predictive models in data science.
Source: www.reddit.com

Related Videos
Related X Posts
Rohan Paul
@rohanpaul_ai
·
16h
LLMs’ inference-time compute scaling improves reasoning, but its effectiveness across diverse complex tasks and varying difficulty is unclear; more compute does not always guarantee better accuracy.This paper empirically evaluates models on diverse tasks using scaling methods.
Rohan Paul
@rohanpaul_ai
·
Apr 9
LLMs’ reasoning often falters when prompts include noise or distractions, unlike performance on clean benchmarks.This study evaluates LLM reasoning robustness by systematically adding four types of controlled perturbations to math problems from the GSM8K dataset and measuring
Wealthy Strategy
@WealthyStrategy
·
Apr 5
Data discrepancies derailing your plans? Inaccuracy is risking your outcomes.
Data-driven accuracy enhancement is the proven solution to ensure precise, dependable strategies.
Here’s the method: centralize data in Redshift for a single source, automate discrepancy checks with dbt
Clément Dumas
@Butanium_
·
Apr 7
Might be clearer with an animation. It’s not automatic, but incentivized. When a latent is 2x less useful in the base model, L1 optimization may zero it out because its reconstruction value is outweighed by the sparsity penalty.
Hao Zhang
@haozhangml
·
Feb 17
Reasoning models boost accuracy by using more tokens at inference—but they also waste a ton just to reach the same accuracy when compared to a non-reasoning model. That’s why reasoning model endpoints burn way more !We show that a simple, training-free certainty-based
Rohan Paul
@rohanpaul_ai
·
Apr 4
Language models learn inefficiently from compressed web text, requiring excessive data.This paper augments pretraining data with inferred “latent thoughts” (reasoning, context) underlying the text, improving data efficiency.Training on text paired with synthetic thoughts