In the ongoing debate over AI training and copyright, 80% of lawsuits involve AI companies, including OpenAI, clashing with rights holders. These disputes center on whether training AI models on copyrighted works constitutes fair use. A significant ruling found that AI training is not fair use, as it threatened to replace Westlaw in the market. OpenAI argues that its models transform copyrighted works by extracting patterns and insights, not replicating them for public consumption. They claim this aligns with copyright’s core objectives and the fair use doctrine. OpenAI has suggested that the upcoming AI Action Plan should declare AI training as fair use to end these legal battles. They warn that without this, China may gain an advantage by accessing copyrighted data that U.S. companies cannot.
Frank La Vigne
@FrankDigsData
·
Mar 12 They Stole My Writing Style! (AI Copyright Nightmare)
#Copyright #AI #IntellectualProperty #LegalBattle #DigitalCopyright #TechLaw #Algorithm #ContentCreation #LegalAdvice #FairUse
Ewan Morrison
@MrEwanMorrison
·
Jan 14 Vast hypocrisy will come into play as Open AI claim copyright protections for their own software, while denying that all the writing, film, personal messages, images and music they scrape has any right to copyright protection.
Valerie F
@fristachinator
·
17m There are over 3 dozen US lawsuits between rights holders and developers of #LLMs
The main point of contention?: “Fair use” of copyrighted content.
Listen in to this episode of
@BBGIntelligence
‘s Votes and Verdicts podcast on Apple and Spotify: https://bloom.bg/3FCakeY
#ai
Mario Nawfal
@MarioNawfal
·
Feb 12 COURT RULES COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL CAN’T BE USED FOR AI TRAINING
A U.S District Judge just crushed AI firms, ruling that training on copyrighted content is not fair use.
The case, Thomson Reuters vs. Ross Intelligence, could set a devastating precedent for AI companies
Jingna Zhang
@zemotion
·
Feb 11 Big news in AI/copyright law: Judge rejects fair-use defense in Westlaw AI copyright suit
“AI-powered legal tool’s ingestion of data isn’t ‘fair use’ under copyright law” 1/
Reid Southen
@Rahll
·
Feb 13 New AI copyright lawsuit just dropped!
This one is from publishers such as The Atlantic, Politico, Vox, Forbes, The Guardian, Los Angeles Times, and Business Insider.
They allege stealing data to compete in the same market, same as the lawsuit Reuters just won
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
![AI Image Copyright: [Protection] or Public Domain?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VqgHr3I0p6Y/mqdefault.jpg)
